International health · 2014
Barriers to access and re-attendance for treatment of podoconiosis: a qualitative study in northern Ethiopia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsegay Girmay, Wubie Moges, Degu Genet, Tamiru Abreham, Cooper Max, Davey Gail
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Podoconiosis is a chronic non-infectious lymphoedema affecting individuals exposed to red clay soil in endemic areas. Evidence from International Orthodox Christian Charities (IOCC) treatment centers' registers suggests that a significant proportion of registered patients with podoconiosis fail to re-attend for treatment, putting them at risk of worsening disability associated with the lymphoedema and attacks of acute adenolymphangitis. The aim of this study was to explore barriers to access and re-attendance of patients with podoconiosis in northern Ethiopia.
METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted at three IOCC treatment sites from February to April 2013. Twenty-eight patients and three project leaders took part in in-depth interviews. Three focus group discussions were undertaken with 22 patients, patient association leaders and project staff members.
RESULTS: Barriers to access and to continued attendance at treatment centers were recognized by all participant groups. The following reasons were reported: lay beliefs about the disease's causation and presentation, occupational, geographic and financial barriers, stigma and conflicting expectations of treatment services.
CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the multiple, step-wise barriers to accessing treatment faced by podoconiosis patients. These factors are dynamic, frequently interact and result from competing social and economic priorities.
METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted at three IOCC treatment sites from February to April 2013. Twenty-eight patients and three project leaders took part in in-depth interviews. Three focus group discussions were undertaken with 22 patients, patient association leaders and project staff members.
RESULTS: Barriers to access and to continued attendance at treatment centers were recognized by all participant groups. The following reasons were reported: lay beliefs about the disease's causation and presentation, occupational, geographic and financial barriers, stigma and conflicting expectations of treatment services.
CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the multiple, step-wise barriers to accessing treatment faced by podoconiosis patients. These factors are dynamic, frequently interact and result from competing social and economic priorities.