Clinical and experimental dermatology · 2021
Equal rates of drug resistance in leprosy cases with relapse and recurrent/chronic Type 2 reaction: time to revise the guidelines for drug-resistance testing in leprosy?
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Narang T, Kamat D, Thakur V, Lavania M, Singh I, Ahuja M, Dogra S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Leprosy relapse/recurrence is a serious concern particularly in a leprosy-endemic nation such as India. It is believed that bacilli persisting even after multidrug therapy can cause relapse; recently, however, drug resistance as a cause for recurrences and chronic erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) has been speculated.
AIM: To study drug-resistance patterns in cases of leprosy relapse and chronic/recurrent (c/r)ENL.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 1 year included patients diagnosed as having leprosy relapse and those with c/rENL. Skin biopsy specimens were examined by conventional PCR for resistance testing for rifampicin, dapsone and ofloxacin, respectively targeting the rpoB, folP and gyrA genes of Mycobacterium leprae.
RESULTS: In total, 61 patients (25 smear-negative) were included in the study. Of these, 37 were diagnosed as having leprosy relapse and 24 as having c/rENL. Drug resistance to at least one drug was identified in 10 cases (16.4%). Rates of drug resistance were 5.4% (2 of 37) for dapsone, 10.8% (4 of 37) for rifampicin and 2.7% (1 of 37) for ofloxacin among cases of relapse, whereas it was 12.5% (3 of 24) and 8.3% (2 of 24) for dapsone and rifampicin respectively among those with c/rENL. Multidrug resistance was seen in 3.3% patients (2 of 61).
CONCLUSION: Drug-resistance rate among those with c/rENL was almost equalled that of relapse. Smear-negative leprosy relapse cases also had resistance to bactericidal drugs. These findings call for modifications in criteria for testing under leprosy drug-resistance surveillance and all cases of relapse and those with recalcitrant c/rENL should be tested.
AIM: To study drug-resistance patterns in cases of leprosy relapse and chronic/recurrent (c/r)ENL.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 1 year included patients diagnosed as having leprosy relapse and those with c/rENL. Skin biopsy specimens were examined by conventional PCR for resistance testing for rifampicin, dapsone and ofloxacin, respectively targeting the rpoB, folP and gyrA genes of Mycobacterium leprae.
RESULTS: In total, 61 patients (25 smear-negative) were included in the study. Of these, 37 were diagnosed as having leprosy relapse and 24 as having c/rENL. Drug resistance to at least one drug was identified in 10 cases (16.4%). Rates of drug resistance were 5.4% (2 of 37) for dapsone, 10.8% (4 of 37) for rifampicin and 2.7% (1 of 37) for ofloxacin among cases of relapse, whereas it was 12.5% (3 of 24) and 8.3% (2 of 24) for dapsone and rifampicin respectively among those with c/rENL. Multidrug resistance was seen in 3.3% patients (2 of 61).
CONCLUSION: Drug-resistance rate among those with c/rENL was almost equalled that of relapse. Smear-negative leprosy relapse cases also had resistance to bactericidal drugs. These findings call for modifications in criteria for testing under leprosy drug-resistance surveillance and all cases of relapse and those with recalcitrant c/rENL should be tested.