Respiratory research · 2026
A deep learning model based on ultrasound imaging to differentiate malignant from benign pleural effusion: a multicenter cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Chang-Wei, Yu Chia-Suan, Chen Yen-Lin, Kuo Po-Chih, Lee Meng-Rui, Wang Jann-Yuan, Ho Chao-Chi, Shih Jin-Yuan, Wang Hao-Chien
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Thoracentesis is required for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) diagnosis. However, it is an invasive procedure and carries risks. It remains unknown whether deep learning using ultrasound images could become a non-invasive diagnostic approach. METHODS: Patients with pleural effusion detected by thoracic ultrasound and received diagnostic thoracentesis were retrospectively collected from two sites. The internal cohort collected patients from the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) Hsin-Chu branch (2014–2021), whereas the external cohort collected patients from NTUH (2020–2021). The MPE was confirmed by cytopathology reports, while benign pleural effusion was ascertained by negative cytology and compatible clinical courses. A convolutional deep learning model was used to identify MPE. Performance metrics included accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 601 and 144 patients from the internal cohort and the external cohort were used for model development. The model achieved promising results in internal testing (accuracy = 0.750 [95% CI: 0.689–0.811], sensitivity = 0.710 [95% CI: 0.619–0.798], specificity = 0.803 [95% CI: 0.704–0.893], F1 = 0.763 [95% CI: 0.691–0.826], AUC = 0.814 [95% CI: 0.746─0.873]). After fine-tuning with small number of external images, the model achieved the following performance on the external testing set: accuracy = 0.774 [95% CI: 0.679–0.857], sensitivity = 0.818 [95% CI: 0.723–0.905)], specificity = 0.611 [95% CI: 0.389–0.846], F1 = 0.850 [95% CI: 0.776–0.913], AUC = 0.753 [95% CI: 0.596–0.885]. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep learning model holds promise as a non-invasive point-of-care modality for assistance in pleural effusion diagnosis.