MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/joco.joco_50_20

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of current ophthalmology · 2020

Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction.

Chung Helen, Sanders Emi, Rocha Guillermo, Bhamra Jamie

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To explore the opinions of Canadian ophthalmologists on refractive and presbyopia-correcting surgeries.

METHODS

We distributed an online survey to the Canadian Ophthalmological Society members, covering laser refractive surgery (LRS), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), lenticular refractive surgery (lenRS) that includes cataract refractive surgery (CRS) with premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and presbyopia correction.

RESULTS

There were 68 (7.6%) total respondents. Most respondents would not consider LRS (62.5%) nor FLACS (73.9%) for themselves. Male sex and performance of LRS or FLACS was significantly associated with consideration of these procedures for self. Most respondents (59.3%) would consider lenRS for themselves. The top method of personal presbyopia correction was spectacles, chosen by 52.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

When surveying the wide body of Canadian ophthalmologists, most respondents preferred spectacle correction of presbyopia and would consider lenRS, but not LRS or FLACS for themselves. Surgeons performing these procedures were more likely to consider them for self.

Для цитирования: Chung Helen, Sanders Emi, Rocha Guillermo, Bhamra Jamie. Canadian Opinions on Refractive Surgery and Approaches to Presbyopia Correction.. Journal of current ophthalmology. 2020. DOI: 10.4103/joco.joco_50_20.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.