Assessing a modified fitting approach for improved multifocal contact lens fitting.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of a modified and previous fitting guide for multifocal (MF) contact lenses that share a common optical design, lotrafilcon B, nelfilcon A, and delefilcon A, in current soft contact lens (CL) wearers needing presbyopia correction.

METHODS

This international multicenter, prospective, randomized, subject-masked study assessed the superiority of the modified guide relative to the previous guide as determined by the number of MF CLs needed to successfully fit each eye at the screening/fitting visit.

RESULTS

A total of 183 presbyopic subjects were randomized to fitting using the modified (n = 99) and previous (n = 84) MF CL fitting guides. The mean ± SD numbers of lenses required to fit each eye at the screening/fitting visit using the modified and previous fitting guides were 1.2 ± 0.5 and 1.4 ± 0.5, respectively. The least-squares mean difference (0.2) met predetermined criteria for superiority of the modified fitting guide. At the screening/fitting visit, 82.8% (164/108) and 65.1% (105/166) of presbyopic eyes were fit with one pair of MF lenses using the modified and previous guides, respectively, and 98.0% (194/198) of eyes were fit with 1-2 pairs of MF lenses using the modified guide. A higher percentage of eye care practitioners gave the highest ratings for ease of fit for the modified than for the previous fitting guide (63.6% [7/11] vs 33.3% [3/9]).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified fitting guide was superior at reducing the number of MF lenses required to successfully fit each presbyopic patient.