Current opinion in cardiology · 2017
Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation: valve technology and procedural outcome.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Salavitabar Arash, Flynn Patrick, Holzer Ralf J
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Procedural technique and short-term outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) have been widely described. The purpose of this article is to provide an update on current valve technology, and to focus on recent data surrounding TPVI in the dilated right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), hybrid interventions, significant outcomes, and procedural costs.
RECENT FINDINGS: Transcatheter valve technology has expanded with current trials evaluating self-expandable valves that can be implanted in dilated RVOTs. Until those valves are widely available, hybrid techniques have been shown to offer a potential alternative in these patients, as well as in patients of small size. Although medium-term results of TPVI have shown 5-year freedom from reintervention or replacement of 76%, new data have underlined some concerns relating to bacterial endocarditis after the procedure. Procedural costs remain a concern, but vary greatly between institutions and healthcare systems.
SUMMARY: TPVI has emerged as one of the most innovative procedures in the treatment of patients with dysfunctional RVOT and pulmonary valves. Further device development is likely to expand the procedure to patients of smaller size and with complex, dilated RVOTs.
RECENT FINDINGS: Transcatheter valve technology has expanded with current trials evaluating self-expandable valves that can be implanted in dilated RVOTs. Until those valves are widely available, hybrid techniques have been shown to offer a potential alternative in these patients, as well as in patients of small size. Although medium-term results of TPVI have shown 5-year freedom from reintervention or replacement of 76%, new data have underlined some concerns relating to bacterial endocarditis after the procedure. Procedural costs remain a concern, but vary greatly between institutions and healthcare systems.
SUMMARY: TPVI has emerged as one of the most innovative procedures in the treatment of patients with dysfunctional RVOT and pulmonary valves. Further device development is likely to expand the procedure to patients of smaller size and with complex, dilated RVOTs.