Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2017
Long-term outcomes of humeral head replacement for the treatment of osteoarthritis; a report of 44 arthroplasties with minimum 10-year follow-up.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robinson William A, Wagner Eric R, Cofield Robert H, Sánchez-Sotelo Joaquín, Sperling John W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated mixed results after humeral head replacement (HHR) for osteoarthritis at short- and medium-term follow-up intervals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes (minimum 10 years) of HHR for the treatment of osteoarthritis.
METHODS: This study included 44 shoulders in 42 patients who had been followed up for a minimum of 10 years, at a mean clinical follow-up of 17 years (range, 10-30 years). Of this group, 31 shoulders had radiographic follow-up beyond 5 years, at a mean of 11.1 years (range, 5-21 years).
RESULTS: Patients experienced significant pain relief postoperatively that was maintained during the long-term follow-up (P < .01), with a subgroup of 11 patients reporting persistent moderate or severe pain. Patients maintained increases in shoulder abduction (<.01), external rotation (<.01) and modified Neer scores (<.01). Ten of 44 (22.7%) shoulders underwent revision surgery, predominantly for glenoid arthrosis (n = 9). In the 25 shoulders with 5 years of radiographic follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated moderate to severe glenoid erosion in 50% at 5 years, which increased to 59% at 15 years and 88% at 20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: HHR remains a successful operation for osteoarthritis at long-term follow-up. However, there is a substantive subgroup with continuing pain and a high rate of glenoid bone erosion after 10 years. Surgeons should carefully consider patients' needs and desires when judging the indications for HHR.
METHODS: This study included 44 shoulders in 42 patients who had been followed up for a minimum of 10 years, at a mean clinical follow-up of 17 years (range, 10-30 years). Of this group, 31 shoulders had radiographic follow-up beyond 5 years, at a mean of 11.1 years (range, 5-21 years).
RESULTS: Patients experienced significant pain relief postoperatively that was maintained during the long-term follow-up (P < .01), with a subgroup of 11 patients reporting persistent moderate or severe pain. Patients maintained increases in shoulder abduction (<.01), external rotation (<.01) and modified Neer scores (<.01). Ten of 44 (22.7%) shoulders underwent revision surgery, predominantly for glenoid arthrosis (n = 9). In the 25 shoulders with 5 years of radiographic follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated moderate to severe glenoid erosion in 50% at 5 years, which increased to 59% at 15 years and 88% at 20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: HHR remains a successful operation for osteoarthritis at long-term follow-up. However, there is a substantive subgroup with continuing pain and a high rate of glenoid bone erosion after 10 years. Surgeons should carefully consider patients' needs and desires when judging the indications for HHR.