Human pathology · 2010
Imprint cytology detects floating Brachyspira in human intestinal spirochetosis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ogata Sho, Higashiyama Masaaki, Adachi Yoshikazu, Ohara Ichiyo, Nishiyama Junichiro, Okusa Yasushi, Takeo Hiroaki, Sato Kimiya, Nakanishi Kuniaki, Kawai Toshiaki
Аннотация
Human intestinal spirochetosis is a colorectal infectious disease caused by 2 Brachyspira species. Its diagnosis is established by histology, culture, and polymerase chain reaction, but the value of cytologic examination in routine practice remains unclear. In this study, imprint cytology of biopsy specimens was examined for cytologic features specific to human intestinal spirochetosis. Specimens were obtained from 65 colorectal regions (1-3 regions from each case) in 25 ultrastructurally and/or genetically confirmed human intestinal spirochetosis cases (20 with Brachyspira aalborgi, 3 with B pilosicoli, 2 with both genotypes). In cytologic specimens, spirochetes tended to be floating freely within the mucus and intestinal fluid, whereas the "fringe formation" of spirochetes typically observed in histologic specimens was indistinct in cytologic specimens. Spirochetes were identified in 58 regions (89.2%) and 23 cases (92.0%) by cytology, against in 50 regions (76.9%) and 22 cases (88.0%) by histology (no significant differences). In 6 of 8 regions exhibiting positive cytology and negative histology, B pilosicoli was present within the mucus. Hence, B pilosicoli may tend to float in the mucus. In conclusion, cytologic examination would be useful for the routine identification of human intestinal spirochetosis, especially if B pilosicoli is involved. Further, we suggest the existence of differences in biological behavior between these spirochetes.