Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1997
Characterization of the excitable gap in human type I atrial flutter.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Callans D J, Schwartzman D, Gottlieb C D, Dillon S M, Marchlinski F E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the excitable gap of the reentrant circuit in atrial flutter.
BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic substrate of typical atrial flutter has not been well characterized. Specifically, it is not known whether the properties of the tricuspid valve isthmus differ from those of the remainder of the circuit.
METHODS: Resetting was performed from two sites within the circuit: proximal (site A) and distal (site B) to the isthmus in 14 patients with type I atrial flutter. Resetting response patterns and the location where interval-dependent conduction slowing occurred were assessed.
RESULTS: Some duration of a flat resetting response (mean +/- SD 40.1 +/- 20.9 ms, 16 +/- 8% of the cycle length) was observed in 13 of 14 patients; 1 patient had a purely increasing response. During the increasing portion of the resetting curve, interval-dependent conduction delay most commonly occurred in the isthmus. In most cases, the resetting response was similar at both sites. In three patients, the resetting response differed significantly between the two sites; this finding suggests that paced beats may transiently change conduction within the circuit or the circuit path, or both.
CONCLUSIONS: Some duration of a flat resetting response was observed in most cases of type I atrial flutter, signifying a fully excitable gap in all portions of the circuit. The isthmus represents the portion of the circuit most vulnerable to interval-dependent conduction delay at short coupling intervals.
BACKGROUND: The electrophysiologic substrate of typical atrial flutter has not been well characterized. Specifically, it is not known whether the properties of the tricuspid valve isthmus differ from those of the remainder of the circuit.
METHODS: Resetting was performed from two sites within the circuit: proximal (site A) and distal (site B) to the isthmus in 14 patients with type I atrial flutter. Resetting response patterns and the location where interval-dependent conduction slowing occurred were assessed.
RESULTS: Some duration of a flat resetting response (mean +/- SD 40.1 +/- 20.9 ms, 16 +/- 8% of the cycle length) was observed in 13 of 14 patients; 1 patient had a purely increasing response. During the increasing portion of the resetting curve, interval-dependent conduction delay most commonly occurred in the isthmus. In most cases, the resetting response was similar at both sites. In three patients, the resetting response differed significantly between the two sites; this finding suggests that paced beats may transiently change conduction within the circuit or the circuit path, or both.
CONCLUSIONS: Some duration of a flat resetting response was observed in most cases of type I atrial flutter, signifying a fully excitable gap in all portions of the circuit. The isthmus represents the portion of the circuit most vulnerable to interval-dependent conduction delay at short coupling intervals.