A systematic review and meta-analysis on the treatment of liver hydatid cyst: Comparing laparoscopic and open surgeries.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: There is an academic debate regarding surgical interventions for liver hydatid cyst disease. The purpose of the current systematic review and meta-analysis study was to analyse the pros and cons of open surgery and laparoscopic techniques, considering the outcomes of liver hydatid cysts.

METHODS

Descriptive Boolean queries were used to search PubMed and Scopus for articles published between January 2000 and December 2016 to evaluate the outcomes of liver hydatid cyst in terms of mortality, post-operative complications, cure rate and recurrences. The data related to the four outcomes of liver hydatid cyst were extracted, assessed and then used as their corresponding effect sizes in the meta-analysis process.

RESULTS

Six studies totally consisting of 1028 patients [open surgery group=816 (+7 converted to lap) and laparoscopic group=212] were analysed. In this meta-analysis study, random effects models of outcomes (i.e. post-operative complications, mortalities, recurrences and cure rate) of the two procedures were OR=0.852, LL=0.469, UL=1.546, Z=-0.526, p=0.599 (for post-operative complications); OR=0.849, LL=0.141, UL=5.105, Z=-0.179, p=0.858 (for mortality); OR=0.903, LL=0.166, UL=4.906, Z=-0.119, p=0.906 (for recurrence); and OR=0.459, LL=0.129, UL=1.637, Z=-1.201, p=0.230 (for cure rate). Meta-analysis and illustrated forest plots showed that there are no superiorities between the two approaches. The results of heterogeneity tests of the above mentioned outcomes were Q=8.083, df=5, p=0.152, I2=38.142% for post-operative complications; Q=0.127, df=2, p=0.938, I2=0% for mortality; Q=4.984, df=2, p=0.083, I2=59.874% for recurrence; and Q=10.639, df=5, p=0.059, I2=53.001% for cure rate. The results of regression tests based on Egger's, smoothed variance based on Egger (SVE) and smoothed variance based on Thomson (SVT) showed that the p values are not significant, and there are neither significant statistical differences nor publication bias between the outcomes of the two treatment procedures.

CONCLUSION

The results show no promising trends towards advantages of open versus laparoscopic surgeries in the treatment of liver hydatid cyst. However, informative measurement values for comparing these surgeries could be derived for complications, recurrence, mortality and cure rates. Furthermore, all three tests, namely Egger's, SVE and SVT regression models, were used to assess publication bias and showed no evidence for the existence of publication bias.