MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3347/kjp.2019.57.3.313

Медицинская библиотека · The Korean journal of parasitology · 2019

Four Taeniasis saginata Cases Diagnosed at a University Hospital in Korea.

Won Eun Jeong, Shin Ju Hyeon, Lee Yu Jeong, Kim Moon-Ju, Kang Seung Ji, Jung Sook In, Kim Soo Hyun, Shin Jong Hee, Chai Jong-Yil, Shin Sung-Shik

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In recent years, the taeniasis has been rarely reported in the Republic of Korea (Korea). But in this study, we intend to report 4 taeniasis cases caused by Taenia saginata during a 5-month period (February to June 2018) at a unversity hospital in Gwangju, Korea. Worm samples (proglottids) discharged from all cases were identified by phenotypic and molecular diagnostics. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequences showed 99.4-99.9% identity with T. saginata but, differed by 4% from T. asiatica and by 7% from T. multiceps, respectively. We found that tapeworms in 2 cases (Cases 2 and 3) yielded exactly the same sequences between them, which differed from those in Cases 1 and 4, suggesting intra-species variation in tapeworms. These taeniasis cases by T. saginata infection in this study, which occurred within a limited time period and region, suggest the possibility of a mini-outbreak. This study highlights the need for further epidemiological investigation of potentially overlooked cases of T. saginata infection in Korea.

Для цитирования: Won Eun Jeong, Shin Ju Hyeon, Lee Yu Jeong, Kim Moon-Ju, Kang Seung Ji, Jung Sook In, Kim Soo Hyun, Shin Jong Hee, Chai Jong-Yil, Shin Sung-Shik. Four Taeniasis saginata Cases Diagnosed at a University Hospital in Korea.. The Korean journal of parasitology. 2019. DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2019.57.3.313.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.