MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.36401/jipo-21-17

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2022

Audiovestibular Toxicity Secondary to Immunotherapy: Case Series and Literature Review.

Page Joshua C, Gidley Paul W, Nader Marc-Elie

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Audiovestibular toxicity secondary to immunotherapy has only rarely been reported in the literature. Herein, we examine our experience diagnosing and managing audiovestibular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients undergoing immunotherapy.

METHODS

Four patients who experienced irAEs were included. Demographics, immunotherapy regimen, diagnostic tests, treatment, and outcomes were recorded in a retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

The cases of three patients with metastatic melanoma and one patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma are presented. Hearing loss and tinnitus were the most common presenting symptoms. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were implicated in three cases and T-cell therapy in one case. Two of three patients (67%) treated with steroids had substantial improvements in hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

Audiovestibular irAEs are a rare complication of immunotherapy. Suspicion for symptoms including hearing loss, tinnitus, and/or vertigo should prompt an expedient referral to the otolaryngologist for evaluation, as symptoms may improve with corticosteroid use. Hearing and/or vestibular deficits can have a substantial impact on the quality of life for affected patients, but rehabilitation options do exist.

Для цитирования: Page Joshua C, Gidley Paul W, Nader Marc-Elie. Audiovestibular Toxicity Secondary to Immunotherapy: Case Series and Literature Review.. Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology. 2022. DOI: 10.36401/jipo-21-17.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.