DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110792
Construct validity of the Mini-TQ-15 for a rapid and differentiated assessment of tinnitus-related distress.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Different domains of tinnitus-related distress can be assessed by self-report questionnaires, such as the original 52-item version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ). Short forms of the TQ allow a more rapid assessment. For this purpose, a new 15-item short form (Mini-TQ-15) has been previously developed. In the present retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare construct validity of the Mini-TQ-15 and the original TQ.
METHODS
Data of 7112 patients with chronic tinnitus that filled out the German 52-item version of the TQ at the Tinnitus Center at Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany were retrospectively analyzed. 1409 of the 7112 patients completed additional psychological tests (ADS-L, BSF, PHQ, ACSA, SWOP) before starting therapy. Data of these 1409 patients with higher tinnitus distress on average were included in the present study. We compared convergent and discriminant validity of the TQ and the Mini-TQ-15 by calculating Spearman's rank correlation between their different factors and the results of further self-report questionnaires.
RESULTS
The factor emotional and cognitive distress of the original TQ and of the Mini-TQ-15 showed specific high correlations with depression scales (correlation coefficients between 0.50 and 0.60) and considerably lower correlations with the other scales.
CONCLUSION
Results of the present study indicate good convergent and discriminant validity of the Mini-TQ-15 and of the original TQ. The three factorial Mini-TQ-15 represents a promising short version with good construct validity for a rapid and differentiated assessment of tinnitus-related distress.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.