Stalking the stalk: Isolated pituitary stalk thickening and predictive factors for proliferative disease.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Few studies have evaluated predictive factors of isolated pituitary stalk thickening (iPST) in children.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, radiology, endocrinology, and neuro-oncology databases were interrogated to identify patients with iPST between January 2000 and June 2019. A blinded, longitudinal assessment of MRIs was performed using quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative metrics. Neuroimaging parameters were correlated to clinical parameters.
RESULTS
Forty-seven patients were identified, with 40 meeting the inclusion criteria. Median age at baseline MRI was 9.6 years (range 0.9-17.5) with median follow-up of 5.2 years (range 0.3-18.6). Twenty-five (63%) were female. Thirty-four (85%) had pituitary dysfunction, including 31 with central diabetes insipidus (cDI). cDI was not predictive of proliferative disease (PfD): 69% of those with presumed primary hypophysitis (PPH) versus 93% with PfD (P = .1). Fourteen (35%) patients were diagnosed with PfD (germinoma = 8, Langerhans cell histiocytosis = 5, lymphoma = 1) at median of 1.3 years (range 0.3-4.0) after initial MRI. Progressive thickening of the stalk over time was associated with PfD (86% vs 4% in PPH, P < .0001), as was thickening of the entire stalk (56% in PfD vs 27% in PPH, P < .0001) with different imaging trends over time observed in PfD versus PPH. A "sack of marbles" appearance with heterogeneous enhancement on post-contrast imaging was associated with germinoma.
CONCLUSIONS
In this cohort, 35% of children with iPST were diagnosed with PfD. The association of cDI and PfD was not statistically significant. Progressive thickening of the entire stalk was predictive of PfD and a "sack of marbles" pattern was found to be highly suggestive of germinoma.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.