Comparison of two objective methods for measuring postoperative toric intraocular lens orientation under the natural pupil.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of iTrace and CASIA2 in measuring the postoperative orientation of toric intraocular lens (IOL) without mydriasis.

SETTING

Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients with SN6AT toric IOLs implanted after cataract surgery were enrolled. 1 month after surgery, the toric IOL orientation were measured by iTrace and CASIA2 in non-mydriatic, semi-dark conditions. Then, the toric axis was directly reviewed using the slit-lamp under full mydriasis. Axis measurement differences between each of the 2 devices and the slit-lamp, described as their relative differences (RDs), were calculated and compared. The percentage of RDs within 5 degrees, within 10 degrees and greater than 30 degrees were analyzed.

RESULTS

77 eyes of 70 patients were included. Generally, the mean toric axis measurement RDs of CASIA2 and iTrace were 9.24 ± 10.53 degrees and 13.89 ± 15.47 degrees respectively ( P = .04). For CASIA2 (72 eyes), 54.17% (39), 72.22% (52), and 4.17% (3) of eyes had RDs within 5 degrees, within 10 degrees and greater than 30 degrees, compared with 40.00% (28), 61.43% (43) and 12.86% (9) for iTrace (70 eyes). The 95% limits of agreements of CASIA2 with slit-lamp was narrower than that of iTrace with slit-lamp. The median RD of CASIA2 was significantly smaller in eyes with pupil ≥4 mm under dark condition compared with eyes with pupil <4 mm ( P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

CASIA2 demonstrates greater precision in measuring toric IOL orientation under non-mydriatic conditions compared with iTrace. Moreover, the accuracy of CASIA2 is enhanced in cases of pupil >4 mm.