American heart journal · 2009
Timing of clopidogrel loading before percutaneous coronary intervention in clopidogrel-naive patients with stable or unstable angina: a comparison of two strategies.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davlouros Periklis A, Arseniou Aggelos, Hahalis George, Chiladakis John, Mazarakis Andreas, Damelou Anastasia, Karakantza Marina, Paliogianni Fotini, Karogiannis Nikolaos, Alexopoulos Dimitrios
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel-naive patients subjected to coronary angiography may be candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel loading with 600 mg at least 2 hours before the procedure is advised for such patients. However, there is no direct evidence that delaying PCI for 2 hours after clopidogrel loading is superior to ad hoc PCI.
METHODS: After coronary angiography, clopidogrel-naive patients (N = 199) with stable or unstable angina, candidates for PCI, were loaded with 900 mg of clopidogrel and then randomized to ad hoc PCI (ad hoc group, n = 103) or delayed PCI 2 hours after loading (delayed group, n = 96). Combined primary end point was death/periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke/reintervention within 30 days post-PCI. Secondary end points were periprocedural MI; periprocedural creatine kinase-MB elevation >3 x upper limit of normal; any periprocedural increase of creatine kinase-MB, troponin-I, or myoglobin above upper limit of normal; Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow <3 after PCI; thrombocytopenia with platelet count of <70,000/mL; major bleeding defined according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria; and elevation of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and soluble P selectin.
RESULTS: Primary end point occurred in 12.6% ad hoc group versus 15.6% delayed group patients (P = .34). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein increased in both groups post-PCI (analysis of variance P < .0001) without difference between groups (P = .5). Major bleeding occurred in 2.9% ad hoc group versus 3.1% delayed group patients (P = .9). No significant difference was observed in any other secondary end point.
CONCLUSIONS: In clopidogrel-naive patients, a strategy of delaying PCI for 2 hours after high-dose clopidogrel loading does not seem to confer any benefit compared to ad hoc PCI.
METHODS: After coronary angiography, clopidogrel-naive patients (N = 199) with stable or unstable angina, candidates for PCI, were loaded with 900 mg of clopidogrel and then randomized to ad hoc PCI (ad hoc group, n = 103) or delayed PCI 2 hours after loading (delayed group, n = 96). Combined primary end point was death/periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke/reintervention within 30 days post-PCI. Secondary end points were periprocedural MI; periprocedural creatine kinase-MB elevation >3 x upper limit of normal; any periprocedural increase of creatine kinase-MB, troponin-I, or myoglobin above upper limit of normal; Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow <3 after PCI; thrombocytopenia with platelet count of <70,000/mL; major bleeding defined according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria; and elevation of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and soluble P selectin.
RESULTS: Primary end point occurred in 12.6% ad hoc group versus 15.6% delayed group patients (P = .34). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein increased in both groups post-PCI (analysis of variance P < .0001) without difference between groups (P = .5). Major bleeding occurred in 2.9% ad hoc group versus 3.1% delayed group patients (P = .9). No significant difference was observed in any other secondary end point.
CONCLUSIONS: In clopidogrel-naive patients, a strategy of delaying PCI for 2 hours after high-dose clopidogrel loading does not seem to confer any benefit compared to ad hoc PCI.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAngina PectorisAngina, UnstableAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryC-Reactive ProteinClopidogrelCoronary AngiographyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleElectrocardiographyEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNephelometry and TurbidimetryP-SelectinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsProspective StudiesTiclopidineTime FactorsTreatment Outcome