MedElevator
Войти в исследования Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
Transcriptional regulatory network analysis identifies conserved cis-antisense ncRNAs in the vancomycin and ceftriaxone stress response of Enterococcus faecalis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pino-Gaete Javiera, Torres Jorge, Véliz-González Maximiliano, Ortega Jaime, Serrano Gladis, Gálvez Gabriel, Di Genova Alex, Glavic Álvaro, Panesso-Botero Diana, Mera-Adasme Raúl, Parra Valentina, Aliaga-Tobar Víctor, Latorre Mauricio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecalis survives antibiotic exposure through coordinated regulatory programs that extend beyond single resistance determinants, yet the systems-level organization of transcriptional and post-transcriptional control under clinically relevant antibiotic stress remains incompletely defined.
METHODS: Here, we analyzed RNA-seq profiles of E. faecalis V583 exposed to vancomycin or ceftriaxone and reconstructed antibiotic-activated, integrative transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) by projecting differentially expressed genes onto a curated TF-target template and explicitly incorporating antisense ncRNA-mRNA predicted links.
RESULTS: Both antibiotics activated a substantial shared response dominated by envelope remodeling/proteostasis and bioenergetic-nucleotide economy, while vancomycin recruited a broader condition-specific program. Despite differing scale (Van-TRN: 533 nodes/587 edges; Cef-TRN: 375 nodes/431 edges), both networks displayed sparse, hub-centered hierarchies and strong nesting, with ∼90% of ceftriaxone regulation contained within the vancomycin scaffold. From the shared ncRNA layer, we prioritized two inducible cis-antisense candidates, ncRNA3340 and ncRNA3683, exhibiting modular, multi-branch predicted folds, dual-site cis targeting, and energetics consistent with strong cis pairing and weaker but favorable trans interactions. Both ncRNAs were globally conserved across 687 clinical isolates, with low variability concentrated outside interaction-defined binding regions. Trans-target prediction points to ncRNA3340 as potentially associated with genome maintenance and cell-surface mRNAs, and ncRNA3683 with GA-like domain, glycine-alanine-rich transcripts, and a bacteriocin locus. Finally, qPCR corroborated the antibiotic-induced transcriptional changes observed for both ncRNAs.
CONCLUSION: Together, these results provide an integrated TRN framework that connects network rewiring to conserved ncRNA-centered candidate control during vancomycin and ceftriaxone stress responses, prioritizing testable ncRNA regulons for downstream functional validation.
METHODS: Here, we analyzed RNA-seq profiles of E. faecalis V583 exposed to vancomycin or ceftriaxone and reconstructed antibiotic-activated, integrative transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) by projecting differentially expressed genes onto a curated TF-target template and explicitly incorporating antisense ncRNA-mRNA predicted links.
RESULTS: Both antibiotics activated a substantial shared response dominated by envelope remodeling/proteostasis and bioenergetic-nucleotide economy, while vancomycin recruited a broader condition-specific program. Despite differing scale (Van-TRN: 533 nodes/587 edges; Cef-TRN: 375 nodes/431 edges), both networks displayed sparse, hub-centered hierarchies and strong nesting, with ∼90% of ceftriaxone regulation contained within the vancomycin scaffold. From the shared ncRNA layer, we prioritized two inducible cis-antisense candidates, ncRNA3340 and ncRNA3683, exhibiting modular, multi-branch predicted folds, dual-site cis targeting, and energetics consistent with strong cis pairing and weaker but favorable trans interactions. Both ncRNAs were globally conserved across 687 clinical isolates, with low variability concentrated outside interaction-defined binding regions. Trans-target prediction points to ncRNA3340 as potentially associated with genome maintenance and cell-surface mRNAs, and ncRNA3683 with GA-like domain, glycine-alanine-rich transcripts, and a bacteriocin locus. Finally, qPCR corroborated the antibiotic-induced transcriptional changes observed for both ncRNAs.
CONCLUSION: Together, these results provide an integrated TRN framework that connects network rewiring to conserved ncRNA-centered candidate control during vancomycin and ceftriaxone stress responses, prioritizing testable ncRNA regulons for downstream functional validation.