MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.034

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of affective disorders · 2024

Intravenous ketamine versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder or bipolar depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Shi Zhan-Ming, Lan Xian-Jun, Chen Qing, Chen Jun-Jun, Su Zhi-Ang, Huang Xing-Bing, Ning Yu-Ping, Yang Xin-Hu, Wei Xin, Zheng Wei

СтатьяМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) ketamine has been evaluated alongside electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in addressing major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression (BD), though the comparative outcomes remain inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a systematic assessment of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IV ketamine relative to ECT for treating MDD or BD.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV ketamine and ECT in terms of efficacy, safety, and tolerability for MDD or BD were identified and reviewed. Three independent investigators extracted relevant data, which was synthesized using RevMan 5.3 software under a random effects model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs encompassing 664 patients diagnosed with MDD or BD were analyzed. At 24 h post-initial treatment, IV ketamine demonstrated a statistically greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared to ECT (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.49, 95 % CI = -0.96 to -0.03, I2 = 77 %; P = 0.04). However, no significant differences were observed between groups in terms of the study-defined response (risk ratio (RR) = 1.49, 95 % CI = 0.08 to 28.42, I2 = 0 %; P = 0.79) at 24 h. Similarly, no notable differences were found for depressive symptom improvement (SMD = -0.48, 95 % CI = -2.41 to 1.45, I2 = 99 %; P = 0.63), the study-defined response (RR = 0.96, 95 % CI: 0.70 to 1.31, I2 = 75 %; P = 0.79) or remission (RR = 0.91, 95 % CI: 0.45 to 1.82, I2 = 90 %; P = 0.78) at the end-of-treatment visit. Among the three RCTs (60 %) comparing the neurocognitive outcomes of IV ketamine and ECT through varying test batteries, results were inconsistent. IV ketamine was associated with marked increases in dissociation, blurred vision, dizziness, and diplopia, while ECT led to a significant rise in muscle pain (all Ps < 0.05). Discontinuation rates due to any cause were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IV ketamine demonstrates a faster onset of antidepressant effects compared to ECT, despite both treatments yielding comparable outcomes at the end-of-treatment visit for patients with MDD or BD. However, large-scale RCTs are required to thoroughly evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of IV ketamine relative to ECT in these populations.

Для цитирования: Shi Zhan-Ming, Lan Xian-Jun, Chen Qing, Chen Jun-Jun, Su Zhi-Ang, Huang Xing-Bing, Ning Yu-Ping, Yang Xin-Hu, Wei Xin, Zheng Wei. Intravenous ketamine versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder or bipolar depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Journal of affective disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.034.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.