DOI 10.1016/j.surge.2023.08.002
Efficacy of mesh coverage in surgical bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Thoracic surgeons are now adopting a new method of using a mesh covering to reduce recurrence in surgical pleurodesis for pneumothorax. We aimed to review the literature and compare the outcomes of using mesh covering as an additional procedure during surgical pleurodesis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed from inception to October 2022 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies (OCSs) comparing the use of mesh coverage, and different materials were included. Data were extracted to compare recurrence and other outcomes using a random effect model.
RESULTS
23 studies consisting of 2 RCTs and 21 OCSs totalling 5092 patients were included. Patients with a mesh had a significantly lower recurrence (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.42, p < 0.0001) and a shorter duration of chest tube drainage (SMD = -0.74 days, 95% CI -0.28 to -1.20, p < 0.0001) but no significant difference in the length of operation. The use of polyglycolic acid (PGA) and vicryl mesh was associated with a significantly shorter duration of chest tube drainage [(PGA, SMD = 0.83 days, 95% CI 0.14-1.52, p < 0.0001), (vicryl, SMD = 1.06 days, 95% CI 0.71-2.82, p = 0.0005)]. They also had a shorter post-operative length of stay than oxidized regenerative cellulose (ORC) but this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
The use of a mesh material reduced the incidence of post-operative air leaks in the short term and the recurrence rate in the long term. Some mesh materials such as PGA and vicryl performed better than other materials.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.