Sexually transmitted infections · 2026
Efficacy of pristinamycin in the treatment of people with Mycoplasma genitalium infection experiencing resistance-guided treatment failure: an observational study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Geddes Gabrielle, Peter Elisha, Saweres Heidi, Alagaratnam Jasmini, Whitlock Gary, Jones Rachael, Rayment Michael
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of pristinamycin in treating Mycoplasma genitalium infection among patients who experienced failure of resistance-guided treatment regimens.
METHODS: This observational study reviewed pharmaceutical and clinical records of patients who received pristinamycin via the named-patient mechanism at a London sexual health service between October 2019 and February 2025. Eligible participants had documented clinical and/or microbiological failure following resistance-guided therapy. Data collected included demographics, sexuality, infection site, macrolide resistance results, prior antibiotic exposure and tetracycline pretreatment. The primary outcome was microbiological cure, defined as a negative test-of-cure ≥4 weeks post treatment. The secondary outcome was clinical cure, defined as resolution of symptoms in the absence of a confirmatory test. We compared proportions with Fisher's exact test for 2×2 comparisons and a single global χ2 test for multicategory comparisons, reporting relative risks with 95% CIs.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were identified; 87% were male, 57% were men who have sex with men, and the mean age was 37 years. Nearly all (97%) had macrolide-resistant infections. Most (81%) had previously received moxifloxacin and the median number of prior antimicrobial courses was three. Microbiological cure was achieved in 71% (48/68; 95% CI 58% to 81%) and clinical cure in 76% (52/68; 95% CI 65% to 86%). When stratified by the use or non-use of tetracycline pretreatment and by the indication for the test, no statistically significant difference in either microbiological or clinical cure was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Pristinamycin achieved microbiological and clinical cure rates of 71-76% in patients with macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infection. These findings align with previously published observational data, supporting pristinamycin as an effective and tolerable third-line treatment option following macrolide-based and quinolone-based regimen failure. Development of standardised algorithms is warranted to optimise management of resistant M. genitalium infection.
METHODS: This observational study reviewed pharmaceutical and clinical records of patients who received pristinamycin via the named-patient mechanism at a London sexual health service between October 2019 and February 2025. Eligible participants had documented clinical and/or microbiological failure following resistance-guided therapy. Data collected included demographics, sexuality, infection site, macrolide resistance results, prior antibiotic exposure and tetracycline pretreatment. The primary outcome was microbiological cure, defined as a negative test-of-cure ≥4 weeks post treatment. The secondary outcome was clinical cure, defined as resolution of symptoms in the absence of a confirmatory test. We compared proportions with Fisher's exact test for 2×2 comparisons and a single global χ2 test for multicategory comparisons, reporting relative risks with 95% CIs.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were identified; 87% were male, 57% were men who have sex with men, and the mean age was 37 years. Nearly all (97%) had macrolide-resistant infections. Most (81%) had previously received moxifloxacin and the median number of prior antimicrobial courses was three. Microbiological cure was achieved in 71% (48/68; 95% CI 58% to 81%) and clinical cure in 76% (52/68; 95% CI 65% to 86%). When stratified by the use or non-use of tetracycline pretreatment and by the indication for the test, no statistically significant difference in either microbiological or clinical cure was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Pristinamycin achieved microbiological and clinical cure rates of 71-76% in patients with macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infection. These findings align with previously published observational data, supporting pristinamycin as an effective and tolerable third-line treatment option following macrolide-based and quinolone-based regimen failure. Development of standardised algorithms is warranted to optimise management of resistant M. genitalium infection.