MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.06.056

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology · 2007

Difficulty in diagnosing a case with apparent sequel cerebral sparganosis.

Murata Kumi, Abe Tatsuya, Gohda Makoto, Inoue Ryo, Ishii Keisuke, Wakabayashi Yukihiro, Kamida Tohru, Fujiki Minoru, Kobayashi Hidenori, Takaoka Hiroyuki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We report on a case of cerebral sparganosis that was correctly identified by a biopsy 10 years after the initial infection.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 62-year-old man presented with an unusual case of cerebral sparganosis mansoni. He was admitted to our hospital for removal of a right frontal meningioma. Computed tomographic scan and MRI of the brain showed atrophy of the left cerebral hemisphere, enlargement of the lateral ventricle, and several small ring-enhanced lesions in the left frontal lobe. The patient had suffered from motor aphasia and right hemiparesis for 10 years; in addition, he had been treated for cerebral infarction. We performed a left frontal biopsy, during which we also removed the meningioma. The histologic diagnosis was cerebral sparganosis mansoni.

CONCLUSIONS

The follow-up CT findings after the patient's first attack were thought to be characteristic of cerebral sparganosis mansoni. However, the radiographic findings were difficult to differentiate from those of neoplasias.

Для цитирования: Murata Kumi, Abe Tatsuya, Gohda Makoto, Inoue Ryo, Ishii Keisuke, Wakabayashi Yukihiro, Kamida Tohru, Fujiki Minoru, Kobayashi Hidenori, Takaoka Hiroyuki. Difficulty in diagnosing a case with apparent sequel cerebral sparganosis.. Surgical neurology. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.06.056.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.