Six-year incidence of visually significant age-related cataract: the Chennai eye disease incidence study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study is to report the 6-year incidence of age-related cataract in a population-based study.
DESIGN
The design used is a population-based cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS
A cohort of 2484 phakic subjects, aged 40 years and above at baseline, from a south Indian population was included in the study.
METHODS
Bilateral phakics with visual acuity of 6/12 or better and cataract less than N2, C2 and P2 on the Lens Opacities Classification System II at baseline were included. Subjects with glaucoma and corneal or retinal diseases were excluded. Incident visually significant cataract was defined as visual acuity of less than 6/18 with a corresponding one grade or greater change in Lens Opacities Classification System II or history of having undergone cataract surgery with evidence of pseudophakia or aphakia at the 6-year follow-up.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-year incidence of visually significant cataract and associated risk factors data were collected.
RESULTS
Incident visually significant cataract at 6 years was seen in 158 subjects (6.36%, 95% CI: 5.40-7.32, phakics:pseudophakics/aphakics 70:88). Incidence was higher in the rural cohort as compared with the urban cohort (P < 0.001). Incidence increased with age and was highest in the ≥70 years age group (odds ratio (OR):31.23, 95% CI: 15.20-64.16, P < 0.001). Other associated risk factors included illiteracy (OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.17-2.61, P = 0.007) and smoking (OR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.08-2.88, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
A significant proportion of the population developed visually significant age-related cataract at 6 years. Incident visually significant cataract was significantly greater for the rural cohort between 50 and 69 years old.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.