Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2011
Prevalence of cataract surgery and postoperative visual outcome in rural central India Central India Eye and Medical Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nangia Vinay, Jonas Jost B, Gupta Rajesh, Khare Anshu, Sinha Ajit
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of cataract surgery and the postoperative visual outcomes in rural central India.
SETTING: Villages in rural central India.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
METHODS: The population-based Central India Eye and Medical Study examined the prevalence of surgical pseudophakia/aphakia, the postoperative visual acuity, and the reasons for decreased postoperative vision in subjects aged 30+ in rural central India. Visual impairment was defined as (1) presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18 or (2) corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) worse than 6/18.
RESULTS: Of the 9392 eyes (99.7%) of 4711 subjects with available data on the lens status, 318 eyes (3.4%) (234 patients, 129 women) had had cataract surgery (5.0% ± 0.3%). Cataract surgery was significantly associated with age (P<.001), female sex (P = .008), shorter axial length (P<.001), and diabetes mellitus (P<.001). The prevalence of postoperative presenting visual impairment was 63% (201/318 eyes) and of postoperative CDVA impairment, 36% (117/318 eyes). The major cause of the former was incorrect intraocular lens (IOL) power (42%); the major causes of the latter were posterior capsule opacification (24%), surgical complications (21%), age-related macular degeneration (10.3%), other macular disorders (4.3%), corneal opacities (3.4%), and glaucoma (2.0%). Surgical complications were significantly more common in the aphakic group than in the pseudophakic group (46.4% versus 2.0%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 5% of the central India population aged 30 years or older had had cataract surgery. Postoperative visual impairment was present in 2 of 3 eyes. The major reasons were incorrect IOL power and surgical complications. Improved IOL power calculations and improved surgical techniques may markedly improve postoperative outcome.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
SETTING: Villages in rural central India.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
METHODS: The population-based Central India Eye and Medical Study examined the prevalence of surgical pseudophakia/aphakia, the postoperative visual acuity, and the reasons for decreased postoperative vision in subjects aged 30+ in rural central India. Visual impairment was defined as (1) presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18 or (2) corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) worse than 6/18.
RESULTS: Of the 9392 eyes (99.7%) of 4711 subjects with available data on the lens status, 318 eyes (3.4%) (234 patients, 129 women) had had cataract surgery (5.0% ± 0.3%). Cataract surgery was significantly associated with age (P<.001), female sex (P = .008), shorter axial length (P<.001), and diabetes mellitus (P<.001). The prevalence of postoperative presenting visual impairment was 63% (201/318 eyes) and of postoperative CDVA impairment, 36% (117/318 eyes). The major cause of the former was incorrect intraocular lens (IOL) power (42%); the major causes of the latter were posterior capsule opacification (24%), surgical complications (21%), age-related macular degeneration (10.3%), other macular disorders (4.3%), corneal opacities (3.4%), and glaucoma (2.0%). Surgical complications were significantly more common in the aphakic group than in the pseudophakic group (46.4% versus 2.0%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 5% of the central India population aged 30 years or older had had cataract surgery. Postoperative visual impairment was present in 2 of 3 eyes. The major reasons were incorrect IOL power and surgical complications. Improved IOL power calculations and improved surgical techniques may markedly improve postoperative outcome.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.