A prospective observational study of decision-making by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis upon recommendation for PEG enteral feeding tubes.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To understand challenges surrounding acceptance of a percutaneous endoscopic gastroscopic enteral feeding tube by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective observational study.
METHODS
This was a prospective observational study of 41 patients and care partners attending a multidisciplinary Motor Neuron Disease clinic. Surveys were administered pregastrostomy tube placement (N = 23) and postplacement (N = 41). Some were not available both pre- and postplacement). For preplacement, we queried barriers affecting their decision for receiving a gastrostomy tube at the time of recommendation. For postplacement, we queried factors that influenced their decision as well as perceived benefit and satisfaction with use.
RESULTS
Patient concerns about receiving a gastrostomy tube centered on the procedure, possible pain/infection (48%), limitations on activities (44%), impact on body image, and possible extension of life. For patients who received a gastrostomy tube, satisfaction was very high (93%), and there was reduced patient (59%) and care partners (54%) stress. The average BMI was 28.6 kg/m2 at diagnosis, and there was no net gain in weight. The average time until placement of a gastrostomy tube following recommendation was 145 days (range 13-824 days).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite counseling at multiple time points, the decision to obtain a feeding tube is often challenging for patients and care partners. Gastrostomy tube placement was perceived as a substantial benefit. Addressing these barriers may reduce concerns and promote earlier decision-making to maximize the benefits of placing a gastrostomy tube sooner.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.