MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/clpt.2012.54

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2012

Detection of pharmacovigilance-related adverse events using electronic health records and automated methods.

Haerian K, Varn D, Vaidya S, Ena L, Chase H S, Friedman C

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Electronic health records (EHRs) are an important source of data for detection of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, adverse events are frequently due not to medications but to the patients' underlying conditions. Mining to detect ADRs from EHR data must account for confounders. We developed an automated method using natural-language processing (NLP) and a knowledge source to differentiate cases in which the patient's disease is responsible for the event rather than a drug. Our method was applied to 199,920 hospitalization records, concentrating on two serious ADRs: rhabdomyolysis (n = 687) and agranulocytosis (n = 772). Our method automatically identified 75% of the cases, those with disease etiology. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.8% (confidence interval: 88.9-96.7%) and 91.8% (confidence interval: 84.0-96.2%), respectively. The method resulted in considerable saving of time: for every 1 h spent in development, there was a saving of at least 20 h in manual review. The review of the remaining 25% of the cases therefore became more feasible, allowing us to identify the medications that had caused the ADRs.

Для цитирования: Haerian K, Varn D, Vaidya S, Ena L, Chase H S, Friedman C. Detection of pharmacovigilance-related adverse events using electronic health records and automated methods.. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2012. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2012.54.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.