The Laryngoscope · 2023
Utility of Extended High-Frequency Audiograms in Clinical Practice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saade Mia, Fernandez Karla, Little Christine, Schwam Zachary G, Cosetti Maura
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Extended high-frequency (EHF) audiometry elicits pure-tone thresholds at frequencies above 8 kHz, which are not included in routine clinical testing. This study explores the utility of EHF audiometry in patients with various audiologic symptoms despite normal-hearing thresholds at ≤8 kHz.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients receiving conventional (250-8 kHz) and EHF (9-20 kHz) audiometry at a tertiary otological referral center between April 2021 and August 2022. Only patients with audiologic symptoms and pure-tone thresholds ≤25 dB HL at ≤8 kHz bilaterally on routine testing were included in subsequent analysis. EHF-PTA was defined for each ear as an average of the air conduction thresholds at 9.0, 10.0, 11.2, 12.5, 14.0, 16.0, 18.0, and 20.0 kHz.
RESULTS: Of the 50 patients who received EHF testing, 40 had audiologic symptoms and normal conventional audiograms at ≤8 kHz. Twenty-five of the 40 (62.5%) were found to have hearing loss in the highest frequencies. Patients with EHF hearing loss (EHF-HL) were more likely to report subjective hearing loss. Age was significantly greater in those with EHF-HL compared with those without EHF-HL, and age was positively correlated with the degree of EHF-HL.
CONCLUSION: EHF testing correlates with audiologic symptoms in patients with normal testing at ≤8 kHz and may be considered when standard audiometry is normal. Additional data are warranted to create an evidenced-based, clinical algorithm for EHF audiometry that can guide treatment, direct mitigation strategies, and potentially identify those at higher risk of hearing loss over time.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:907-910, 2024.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients receiving conventional (250-8 kHz) and EHF (9-20 kHz) audiometry at a tertiary otological referral center between April 2021 and August 2022. Only patients with audiologic symptoms and pure-tone thresholds ≤25 dB HL at ≤8 kHz bilaterally on routine testing were included in subsequent analysis. EHF-PTA was defined for each ear as an average of the air conduction thresholds at 9.0, 10.0, 11.2, 12.5, 14.0, 16.0, 18.0, and 20.0 kHz.
RESULTS: Of the 50 patients who received EHF testing, 40 had audiologic symptoms and normal conventional audiograms at ≤8 kHz. Twenty-five of the 40 (62.5%) were found to have hearing loss in the highest frequencies. Patients with EHF hearing loss (EHF-HL) were more likely to report subjective hearing loss. Age was significantly greater in those with EHF-HL compared with those without EHF-HL, and age was positively correlated with the degree of EHF-HL.
CONCLUSION: EHF testing correlates with audiologic symptoms in patients with normal testing at ≤8 kHz and may be considered when standard audiometry is normal. Additional data are warranted to create an evidenced-based, clinical algorithm for EHF audiometry that can guide treatment, direct mitigation strategies, and potentially identify those at higher risk of hearing loss over time.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:907-910, 2024.