MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-16379-2

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgical oncology · 2024

Society of Surgical Oncology Consensus Statement: Assessing the Evidence for and Utility of Gene Expression Profiling of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Bartlett Edmund K, O'Donoghue Cristina, Boland Genevieve, Bowles Tawnya, Delman Keith A, Hieken Tina J, Moncrieff Marc, Wong Sandra, White Richard L, Karakousis Giorgos, Society of Surgical Oncology Gene Expression Profiling Consensus Statement Work Group

СтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Gene expression profiling (GEP) of primary cutaneous melanoma aims to offer prognostic and predictive information to guide clinical care. Despite limited evidence of clinical utility, these tests are increasingly incorporated into clinical care.

METHODS

A panel of melanoma experts from the Society of Surgical Oncology convened to develop recommendations regarding the use of GEP to guide management of patients with melanoma. The use of currently available GEP tests were evaluated in three clinical scenarios: (1) the utility in patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy; (2) the utility to guide surveillance; and (3) the utility to inform adjuvant therapy. As a basis for these recommendations, the panel performed a systematic review of the literature, including articles published from January 2012 until August 2023.

RESULTS

After review of 137 articles, 50 met the inclusion criteria. These articles included evidence related to three available GEP tests: 31-GEP, CP-GEP, and 11-GEP. The consensus recommendations were finalized using a modified Delphi process. The panel found that current evidence often fails to account for known clinicopathologic risk factors and lacks high-level data. The panel recognizes that the study of GEP tests is still evolving. The integration of GEP into routine clinical practice for predicting sentinel lymph node status and patient prognosis in melanoma is therefore not currently recommended.

CONCLUSION

At present, GEP should be considered primarily an investigational tool, ideally used in the context of clinical trials or specialized research settings.

Для цитирования: Bartlett Edmund K, O'Donoghue Cristina, Boland Genevieve, Bowles Tawnya, Delman Keith A, Hieken Tina J, Moncrieff Marc, Wong Sandra, White Richard L, Karakousis Giorgos, Society of Surgical Oncology Gene Expression Profiling Consensus Statement Work Group. Society of Surgical Oncology Consensus Statement: Assessing the Evidence for and Utility of Gene Expression Profiling of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.. Annals of surgical oncology. 2024. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16379-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.