Arab journal of gastroenterology : the official publication of the Pan-Arab Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
Effects of rebamipide quadruple therapy with gastrointestinal endoscopy adjuvant therapy on gastrointestinal hormones in patients with gastric ulcer bleeding.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jing Jiachen, Yu Jinling, Ji Beina, Guo Jing, Li Chenlu, Cheng Zhonghua
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The study aimed to investigate the effect of rebamipide quadruple therapy combined with gastrointestinal endoscopy on gastrointestinal hormones in patients with gastric ulcer bleeding.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with gastric ulcer bleeding were enrolled and randomly assigned into a control group and an observation group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group received rebamipide quadruple therapy, while the observation group received gastrointestinal endoscopy combined with rebamipide therapy. The two groups were compared on general data, therapeutic efficacy, clinical parameters (blood transfusions, hemostasis time, melena relief time, ulcer healing time, and hospitalization duration), coagulation parameters (D-dimer, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen), serum levels of gastrin (GAS), motilin (MTL), somatostatin (SS), as well as adverse reactions and re-bleeding rates.
RESULTS: The observation group showed a significantly higher clinical efficacy (95.00 %) compared to the control group (80.00 %) (P < 0.05). The observation group had lower blood transfusion volume (401.25 ± 23.57 mL vs. 487.54 ± 30.23 mL), shorter hemostasis time (45.33 ± 9.90 h vs. 51.25 ± 11.62 h), quicker melena remission time (3.37 ± 1.30 d vs. 4.32 ± 1.43 d), faster ulcer healing time (13.73 ± 2.46 d vs. 16.12 ± 3.59 d), and shorter hospitalization time (16.53 ± 2.10 d vs. 19.78 ± 2.47 d) (all P < 0.05). Post-treatment,MTL and GAS levels decreased and SS levels increased in both groups, with the observation group showing significant improvements (P < 0.05). Fib levels also rose in the observation group (3.76 ± 0.31 s vs. 2.64 ± 0.53 s) (P < 0.05). Additionally, D-D, PT, and APTT levels decreased in the observation group and were significantly lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group had a lower incidence of adverse reactions (8.33 %) and re-bleeding rate (3.33 %) compared to the control group (25.00 % and 16.67 %) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Rebamipide therapy combined with gastrointestinal endoscopy is an effective treatment for gastric ulcer bleeding and demonstrates a high level of safety.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with gastric ulcer bleeding were enrolled and randomly assigned into a control group and an observation group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group received rebamipide quadruple therapy, while the observation group received gastrointestinal endoscopy combined with rebamipide therapy. The two groups were compared on general data, therapeutic efficacy, clinical parameters (blood transfusions, hemostasis time, melena relief time, ulcer healing time, and hospitalization duration), coagulation parameters (D-dimer, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen), serum levels of gastrin (GAS), motilin (MTL), somatostatin (SS), as well as adverse reactions and re-bleeding rates.
RESULTS: The observation group showed a significantly higher clinical efficacy (95.00 %) compared to the control group (80.00 %) (P < 0.05). The observation group had lower blood transfusion volume (401.25 ± 23.57 mL vs. 487.54 ± 30.23 mL), shorter hemostasis time (45.33 ± 9.90 h vs. 51.25 ± 11.62 h), quicker melena remission time (3.37 ± 1.30 d vs. 4.32 ± 1.43 d), faster ulcer healing time (13.73 ± 2.46 d vs. 16.12 ± 3.59 d), and shorter hospitalization time (16.53 ± 2.10 d vs. 19.78 ± 2.47 d) (all P < 0.05). Post-treatment,MTL and GAS levels decreased and SS levels increased in both groups, with the observation group showing significant improvements (P < 0.05). Fib levels also rose in the observation group (3.76 ± 0.31 s vs. 2.64 ± 0.53 s) (P < 0.05). Additionally, D-D, PT, and APTT levels decreased in the observation group and were significantly lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group had a lower incidence of adverse reactions (8.33 %) and re-bleeding rate (3.33 %) compared to the control group (25.00 % and 16.67 %) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Rebamipide therapy combined with gastrointestinal endoscopy is an effective treatment for gastric ulcer bleeding and demonstrates a high level of safety.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansMaleFemaleMiddle AgedAlanineAnti-Ulcer AgentsGastrinsQuinolonesPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageEndoscopy, GastrointestinalAgedAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationStomach UlcerMotilinSomatostatinTreatment OutcomeBlood TransfusionFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsFibrinogenGastrointestinal HormonesCombined Modality Therapy