American journal of ophthalmology · 2003
Evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin and special stains for the detection of acanthamoeba keratitis in penetrating keratoplasties.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grossniklaus Hans E, Waring George O, Akor Charlotte, Castellano-Sanchez Amilcar A, Bennett Kevin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a battery of routine and special histologic stains for the detection of acanthamoeba keratitis.
DESIGN: Observational study.
METHODS: Nine patients with culture-proven infectious keratitis whose clinical differential diagnosis included acanthamoeba and who had undergone penetrating keratoplasty were identified. Three cases each of culture-proven acanthamoeba, fungal, and herpes simplex keratitis were reviewed. Serial sections of the keratoplasty specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), Gomori methanamine silver (GMS), giemsa, Gram, calcofluor white, and acridine orange. Sections were reviewed in a random order and a masked fashion and classified as positive or negative for acanthamoeba, fungus, or herpes.
RESULTS: The correct diagnosis was made by examination of the hematoxylin and eosin stained slides in all cases. Correct diagnoses in decreasing order of frequency were made for slides stained with PAS, GMS, acridine orange, calcofluor white, giemsa, and Gram. There were false-positive diagnoses made only with calcofluor white and acridine orange stained slides because of staining of extracellular debris and other material.
CONCLUSIONS: When sections are examined by an experienced observer, hematoxylin and eosin is useful compared with calcofluor white, acridine orange, GMS, PAS, giemsa, and Gram stains for the detection of acanthamoeba keratitis.
DESIGN: Observational study.
METHODS: Nine patients with culture-proven infectious keratitis whose clinical differential diagnosis included acanthamoeba and who had undergone penetrating keratoplasty were identified. Three cases each of culture-proven acanthamoeba, fungal, and herpes simplex keratitis were reviewed. Serial sections of the keratoplasty specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), Gomori methanamine silver (GMS), giemsa, Gram, calcofluor white, and acridine orange. Sections were reviewed in a random order and a masked fashion and classified as positive or negative for acanthamoeba, fungus, or herpes.
RESULTS: The correct diagnosis was made by examination of the hematoxylin and eosin stained slides in all cases. Correct diagnoses in decreasing order of frequency were made for slides stained with PAS, GMS, acridine orange, calcofluor white, giemsa, and Gram. There were false-positive diagnoses made only with calcofluor white and acridine orange stained slides because of staining of extracellular debris and other material.
CONCLUSIONS: When sections are examined by an experienced observer, hematoxylin and eosin is useful compared with calcofluor white, acridine orange, GMS, PAS, giemsa, and Gram stains for the detection of acanthamoeba keratitis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acanthamoeba KeratitisAcridine OrangeBenzenesulfonatesCorneaDouble-Blind MethodEosine Yellowish-(YS)Eye Infections, FungalFalse Positive ReactionsFluorescent DyesHematoxylinHumansKeratitis, HerpeticKeratoplasty, PenetratingMicroscopy, FluorescencePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsStaining and Labeling