MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.20471/acc.2017.56.02.05

Медицинская библиотека · Acta clinica Croatica · 2017

Comparison of Optic Nerve Head Morphology in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

Jurišić Darija, Novak Lauš Katia, Sesar Irena, Kuzman Tomislav

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The aim of this study was to assess damage to retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and morphology of the optic nerve head (ONH) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). The study included three groups of patients, as follows: 40 eyes with POAG, 40 eyes with NAION and 40 eyes with refraction anomaly. All patients underwent standard automated perimetry and analysis of ONH topography by using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO)-HRT II. Visual field defects such as decreased retinal sensitivity prevailed in the eyes with POAG, whereas in the eyes with NAION they were mostly manifested as concentrically narrowed visual field and quadrant excesses. Topographic ONH alterations, examined by HRT II, showed the same number of sectors to be affected in the eyes with POAG and NAION. A larger number of sectors in the upper part of ONH were affected in the eyes with NAION. Optic disc morphology differed significantly between the eyes with POAG and NAION by a higher rate of neuroretinal rim thinning and higher mean cup depth in the POAG group.

Для цитирования: Jurišić Darija, Novak Lauš Katia, Sesar Irena, Kuzman Tomislav. Comparison of Optic Nerve Head Morphology in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.. Acta clinica Croatica. 2017. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.02.05.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.