DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.06.004
Comparative analysis of methods for detection of anti-laminin 5 autoantibodies in patients with anti-epiligrin cicatricial pemphigoid.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Anti-epiligrin cicatricial pemphigoid (AECP) is a subepidermal blistering disease characterized by circulating anti-basement membrane autoantibodies to laminin 5.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the relative sensitivity of immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation techniques for the detection of anti-laminin 5 antibodies, comparative studies using reference laminin 5 antiserum as well as sera from patients with AECP, other immunobullous diseases, and normal volunteers were performed.
METHODS
Equivalent amounts of protein from five different substrates were studied by immunoblotting; immunoprecipitation experiments examined biosynthetically radiolabeled human keratinocyte (HK) extracts. Results HK extracellular matrix (ECM) was the most sensitive substrate for detection of antibodies to laminin 5; extracts of HKs, A-431 cells and HaCat cells represented alternative test substrates (though the later required higher amounts of protein input). Sera from patients with AECP immunoblotted laminin 5 in HK ECM at end titers exceeding those identified in indirect immunofluorescence microscopy studies of 1 M NaCl split skin. Immunoprecipitation studies found that a 10,000-fold dilution of reference laminin 5 antiserum retained the ability to identify laminin 5. Maximal dilutions of sera from AECP patients retaining the ability to immunoprecipitate laminin 5 ranged from 500 to 5,000.
CONCLUSION
Immunoprecipitation was the most sensitive technique for detection of anti-laminin 5 antibodies, while immunoblotting of HK ECM or HK extracts represented practical alternatives.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.