MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bjo.85.8.905

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of ophthalmology · 2001

Amniotic membrane grafts, "fresh" or frozen? A clinical and in vitro comparison.

Adds P J, Hunt C J, Dart J K

Клинический случайСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of "fresh" (hypothermically stored) and frozen amniotic membrane (AM) was compared in a patient with cicatricial pemphigoid with stem cell failure. The viability of both "fresh" and frozen AM epithelial cells was assessed after storage.

METHODS

AM was stored at either +4 degrees C ("fresh") or at -80 degrees C (frozen). A "fresh" graft was applied to the cornea following superficial keratectomy. Subsequently, a further frozen graft was applied to the same eye. Viability of the stored AM epithelium was assessed by investigating membrane integrity and mitochondrial activity.

RESULTS

In both cases the cornea re-epithelialised and visual acuity improved. Improvement, however, was not sustained.

CONCLUSION

Although both procedures led to an improvement in visual acuity, "fresh" tissue performed no better than frozen in promoting re-epithelialisation. The authors suggest that logistical, safety, and cost considerations outweigh any benefits of using "fresh" as opposed to frozen graft material.

Для цитирования: Adds P J, Hunt C J, Dart J K. Amniotic membrane grafts, "fresh" or frozen? A clinical and in vitro comparison.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2001. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.8.905.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.