MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003411

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025

Acetic Acid-Indigo Carmine Chromocolonoscopy for Proximal Serrated Lesions: A Randomized, 3-Arm Colonoscopy Study.

Kinugasa Hideaki, Hiraoka Sakiko, Kobayashi Sayo, Matsubara Minoru, Nagahara Teruya, Higashi Reiji, Takei Kensuke, Ohmori Masayasu, Nakamura Takashi, Tsuzuki Takao, Tanaka Shouichi, Hirai Ryosuke, Toyosawa Junki, Aoyama Yuki, Yamasaki Yasushi, Inokuchi Toshihiro, Takahara Masahiro, Tanaka Takehiro, Mitsuhashi Toshiharu, Otsuka Motoyuki, cAIM Study Group

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently originates from serrated lesions (SLs), particularly in the proximal colon, which are challenging to detect using standard screening colonoscopy. Although duplicate examinations or chromocolonoscopies are recommended for detecting proximal SLs, evidence from randomized trials is limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of tandem colonoscopy with an acetic acid-indigo carmine mixture (AIM) for detecting SLs in the proximal colon compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and indigo carmine (IC).

METHODS

This 3-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving 9 institutions enrolled patients undergoing colonoscopy and assigned them randomly to the WLI, IC, or AIM group. The primary outcomes were the SL-detection rate (SDR) of proximal lesions during the second examination (SDR 2nd ) and SL additional rate (SAR). Secondary outcomes included the detection and additional rates of other polyps, factors contributing to SAR, and complications.

RESULTS

Between 2021 and 2024, 1,319 participants with 1,267 polyps were included in the analysis. With AIM, the SDR 2nd and SAR were significantly higher compared with WLI or IC (WLI vs AIM: 2.7% vs 14.0%, P < 0.001; IC vs AIM: 7.9% vs 14.0%, P = 0.002, and WLI vs AIM: 22.4% vs 69.3%, P < 0.001; IC vs AIM: 45.8% vs 69.3%, P = 0.001). AIM conferred a higher adenoma detection rate 2nd than with WLI (10.5% vs 24.7%; P < 0.001) and was an independent factor for SAR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 7.79 [3.76-17.08]). No major adverse events were observed.

DISCUSSION: AIM significantly improved proximal colon SDRs and outperformed WLI and IC. The relationship between SDR and CRC incidence warrants further investigation.

Для цитирования: Kinugasa Hideaki, Hiraoka Sakiko, Kobayashi Sayo, Matsubara Minoru, Nagahara Teruya, Higashi Reiji, Takei Kensuke, Ohmori Masayasu, Nakamura Takashi, Tsuzuki Takao, Tanaka Shouichi, Hirai Ryosuke, Toyosawa Junki, Aoyama Yuki, Yamasaki Yasushi, Inokuchi Toshihiro, Takahara Masahiro, Tanaka Takehiro, Mitsuhashi Toshiharu, Otsuka Motoyuki, cAIM Study Group. Acetic Acid-Indigo Carmine Chromocolonoscopy for Proximal Serrated Lesions: A Randomized, 3-Arm Colonoscopy Study.. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2025. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003411.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.