MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.2013.50.8267

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014

Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES Study.

Escudier Bernard, Porta Camillo, Bono Petri, Powles Thomas, Eisen Tim, Sternberg Cora N, Gschwend Jürgen E, De Giorgi Ugo, Parikh Omi, Hawkins Robert, Sevin Emmanuel, Négrier Sylvie, Khan Sadya, Diaz Jose, Redhu Suman, Mehmud Faisal, Cella David

Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes may help inform treatment choice in advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly between approved targeted therapies with similar efficacy. This double-blind cross-over study evaluated patient preference for pazopanib or sunitinib and the influence of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and safety factors on their stated preference.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Patients with metastatic RCC were randomly assigned to pazopanib 800 mg per day for 10 weeks, a 2-week washout, and then sunitinib 50 mg per day (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 4 weeks on) for 10 weeks, or the reverse sequence. The primary end point, patient preference for a specific treatment, was assessed by questionnaire at the end of the two treatment periods. Other end points and analyses included reasons for preference, physician preference, safety, and HRQoL.

RESULTS

Of 169 randomly assigned patients, 114 met the following prespecified modified intent-to-treat criteria for the primary analysis: exposure to both treatments, no disease progression before cross over, and completion of the preference questionnaire. Significantly more patients preferred pazopanib (70%) over sunitinib (22%); 8% expressed no preference (P < .001). All preplanned sensitivity analyses, including the intent-to-treat population, statistically favored pazopanib. Less fatigue and better overall quality of life were the main reasons for preferring pazopanib, with less diarrhea being the most cited reason for preferring sunitinib. Physicians also preferred pazopanib (61%) over sunitinib (22%); 17% expressed no preference. Adverse events were consistent with each drug's known profile. Pazopanib was superior to sunitinib in HRQoL measures evaluating fatigue, hand/foot soreness, and mouth/throat soreness.

CONCLUSION

This innovative cross-over trial demonstrated a significant patient preference for pazopanib over sunitinib, with HRQoL and safety as key influencing factors.

Для цитирования: Escudier Bernard, Porta Camillo, Bono Petri, Powles Thomas, Eisen Tim, Sternberg Cora N, Gschwend Jürgen E, De Giorgi Ugo, Parikh Omi, Hawkins Robert, Sevin Emmanuel, Négrier Sylvie, Khan Sadya, Diaz Jose, Redhu Suman, Mehmud Faisal, Cella David. Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES Study.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2014. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.50.8267.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.