Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris · 1998
[Bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA): clinical evaluation].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jankowski R, Pialoux R, Labaeye P, Simon C
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) allows direct bone-conduction through a titanium implant. This avoids skin irritation and seems to improve the sound quality when compared with a conventional bone hearing aid. Aim of this work was to evaluate this new hearing-aid.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: 9 patients have been operated on between May 1994 and April 1997. Two aural atresia and 7 radical mastoidectomy; 6 had prior conventional bone hearing aid and one a bilateral air-conduction hearing aid. Their mean bone conduction threshold was 28 dB (17-38 dB). Their maximum speech discrimination score was 100%. Audiological tests and questionnaires were used for the evaluation.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 9-months (3-35). Osseointegration succeeded in the 9 cases. Skin tolerance was excellent in 6 cases. 3 patients had transient adverse skin reactions, with one having needed a revision surgery under local anesthesia. All patients use their BAHA everyday. The mean prosthesis gain was 36 dB (20-50 dB). Eight patients completed the questionnaire. Patients reported an overall satisfaction score between 9 and 10 (range 6-10). BAHA advantageously replaced the prior hearing aid (mean satisfaction score: 9.1 for BAHA versus 5.9). The only complaints were sensitivity to wind noise and lack of a phone connexion.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: 9 patients have been operated on between May 1994 and April 1997. Two aural atresia and 7 radical mastoidectomy; 6 had prior conventional bone hearing aid and one a bilateral air-conduction hearing aid. Their mean bone conduction threshold was 28 dB (17-38 dB). Their maximum speech discrimination score was 100%. Audiological tests and questionnaires were used for the evaluation.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 9-months (3-35). Osseointegration succeeded in the 9 cases. Skin tolerance was excellent in 6 cases. 3 patients had transient adverse skin reactions, with one having needed a revision surgery under local anesthesia. All patients use their BAHA everyday. The mean prosthesis gain was 36 dB (20-50 dB). Eight patients completed the questionnaire. Patients reported an overall satisfaction score between 9 and 10 (range 6-10). BAHA advantageously replaced the prior hearing aid (mean satisfaction score: 9.1 for BAHA versus 5.9). The only complaints were sensitivity to wind noise and lack of a phone connexion.