Long-term results after endoanal advancement flap repair for fistulas-in-ano. How important is the aetiology?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess primary healing, recurrence and continence after endoanal advancement flap repair (EAFR).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients with fistulas-in-ano of different etiologies received endoanal advancement flap repair between 1997 and 2009. This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-centre, single-surgeon study.

RESULTS

Follow-up data was available for 71 patients. 47.9 % had cryptoglandular fistulas. In 40.8 %, the fistulas were due to chronic inflammatory bowel disease. In 11.3 %, the fistula was a consequence of treatment for cancer. Primary healing was observed in 41 of the cases (57.7 %). The median time to recurrence was 27 months (mean 43.43 ± 48.11) and differed significantly across the patient groups: cryptoglandular origin 51 months (mean 57.09 ± 52.57), condition after cancer treatment 43 months (mean 31 ± 23.142), inflammatory bowel disease 11 months (mean 23.65 ± 32.47) (p < 0.01). Preoperatively, 31 (44.3 %) of the patients had impaired continence vs 30 (42.9 %) postoperatively. Overall, postoperative mean Cleveland Clinic incontinence score values improved significantly (preoperative 3.74 ± 4.558 vs postoperative 2.68 ± 4.752, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Full-thickness endoanal advancement flap repair is a successful treatment option for a range of fistula etiologies. Overall, fistula aetiology proved to be prognostically more relevant than fistula location. Fistulas associated with chronic inflammatory bowel disease were found to have a significantly higher rate of recurrence and shorter time to recurrence at long-term follow-up. Repeat interventions do not negatively impact postoperative continence.