MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1303989

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2013

Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.

Motzer Robert J, Hutson Thomas E, Cella David, Reeves James, Hawkins Robert, Guo Jun, Nathan Paul, Staehler Michael, de Souza Paul, Merchan Jaime R, Boleti Ekaterini, Fife Kate, Jin Jie, Jones Robert, Uemura Hirotsugu, De Giorgi Ugo, Harmenberg Ulrika, Wang Jinwan, Sternberg Cora N, Deen Keith, McCann Lauren, Hackshaw Michelle D, Crescenzo Rocco, Pandite Lini N, Choueiri Toni K

Клиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pazopanib and sunitinib provided a progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo or interferon, in previous phase 3 studies involving patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3, randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of pazopanib and sunitinib as first-line therapy.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1110 patients with clear-cell, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a continuous dose of pazopanib (800 mg once daily; 557 patients) or sunitinib in 6-week cycles (50 mg once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment; 553 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by independent review, and the study was powered to show the noninferiority of pazopanib versus sunitinib. Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Pazopanib was noninferior to sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival (hazard ratio for progression of disease or death from any cause, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.22), meeting the predefined noninferiority margin (upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, <1.25). Overall survival was similar (hazard ratio for death with pazopanib, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.08). Patients treated with sunitinib, as compared with those treated with pazopanib, had a higher incidence of fatigue (63% vs. 55%), the hand-foot syndrome (50% vs. 29%), and thrombocytopenia (78% vs. 41%); patients treated with pazopanib had a higher incidence of increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (60%, vs. 43% with sunitinib). The mean change from baseline in 11 of 14 health-related quality-of-life domains, particularly those related to fatigue or soreness in the mouth, throat, hands, or feet, during the first 6 months of treatment favored pazopanib (P<0.05 for all 11 comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Pazopanib and sunitinib have similar efficacy, but the safety and quality-of-life profiles favor pazopanib. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; COMPARZ ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00720941.).

Для цитирования: Motzer Robert J, Hutson Thomas E, Cella David, Reeves James, Hawkins Robert, Guo Jun, Nathan Paul, Staehler Michael, de Souza Paul, Merchan Jaime R, Boleti Ekaterini, Fife Kate, Jin Jie, Jones Robert, Uemura Hirotsugu, De Giorgi Ugo, Harmenberg Ulrika, Wang Jinwan, Sternberg Cora N, Deen Keith, McCann Lauren, Hackshaw Michelle D, Crescenzo Rocco, Pandite Lini N, Choueiri Toni K. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.. The New England journal of medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1303989.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.