MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.07.033

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmology · 2021

Differentiation of Active Corneal Infections from Healed Scars Using Deep Learning.

Tiwari Mo, Piech Chris, Baitemirova Medina, Prajna Namperumalsamy V, Srinivasan Muthiah, Lalitha Prajna, Villegas Natacha, Balachandar Niranjan, Chua Janice T, Redd Travis, Lietman Thomas M, Thrun Sebastian, Lin Charles C

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate an automated, portable algorithm to differentiate active corneal ulcers from healed scars using only external photographs.

DESIGN

A convolutional neural network was trained and tested using photographs of corneal ulcers and scars.

PARTICIPANTS

De-identified photographs of corneal ulcers were obtained from the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT), Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial (MUTT), and Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University.

METHODS

Photographs of corneal ulcers (n = 1313) and scars (n = 1132) from the SCUT and MUTT were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN was tested on 2 different patient populations from eye clinics in India (n = 200) and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University (n = 101). Accuracy was evaluated against gold standard clinical classifications. Feature importances for the trained model were visualized using gradient-weighted class activation mapping.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy of the CNN was assessed via F1 score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to measure the precision-recall trade-off.

RESULTS

The CNN correctly classified 115 of 123 active ulcers and 65 of 77 scars in patients with corneal ulcer from India (F1 score, 92.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 88.2%-95.8%]; sensitivity, 93.5% [95% CI, 89.1%-97.9%]; specificity, 84.42% [95% CI, 79.42%-89.42%]; ROC: AUC, 0.9731). The CNN correctly classified 43 of 55 active ulcers and 42 of 46 scars in patients with corneal ulcers from Northern California (F1 score, 84.3% [95% CI, 77.2%-91.4%]; sensitivity, 78.2% [95% CI, 67.3%-89.1%]; specificity, 91.3% [95% CI, 85.8%-96.8%]; ROC: AUC, 0.9474). The CNN visualizations correlated with clinically relevant features such as corneal infiltrate, hypopyon, and conjunctival injection.

CONCLUSIONS

The CNN classified corneal ulcers and scars with high accuracy and generalized to patient populations outside of its training data. The CNN focused on clinically relevant features when it made a diagnosis. The CNN demonstrated potential as an inexpensive diagnostic approach that may aid triage in communities with limited access to eye care.

Для цитирования: Tiwari Mo, Piech Chris, Baitemirova Medina, Prajna Namperumalsamy V, Srinivasan Muthiah, Lalitha Prajna, Villegas Natacha, Balachandar Niranjan, Chua Janice T, Redd Travis, Lietman Thomas M, Thrun Sebastian, Lin Charles C. Differentiation of Active Corneal Infections from Healed Scars Using Deep Learning.. Ophthalmology. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.07.033.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.