Electrical promontory stimulation test using a portable peripheral nerve stimulator with an ear canal electrode.

OBJECTIVE

An intact cochlear nerve is necessary for successful cochlear implantation (CI). Although the promontory stimulation test (PST) using a promontory stimulator (PS) and a transtympanic needle electrode is invasive, it is still commonly used to verify cochlear nerve function. PSs are currently unavailable because they are no longer manufactured; however, considering that PST continues to be beneficial in certain situations, alternative equipment is needed. The PNS-7000® (PNS) was developed as a neurologic instrument for stimulating the peripheral nerves. This study investigated the usefulness of the ear canal stimulation test (ECST) using PNS with a silver ball ear canal electrode, which is a new noninvasive alternative technique to the PST.

METHODS

ECST was performed from November 2013 to December 2018 using PS and PNS for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The electrical threshold, most comfortable loudness level, uncomfortable loudness level, dynamic range, and gap detection were measured in the ECST. The results of these measured PNS items were compared with PS.

RESULTS

ECST was performed in 61 ears of 35 patients (age, 59.9 ± 20.1 years) using PS and PNS. The sound sensation was elicited in 51 (83.6%) and 52 (85.2%) ears with PS and PNS, respectively. All items excluding GAP were measured in 46 (75%) and 43 (70%) ears at 50 and 100 Hz, respectively. GAP was measured in 33 ears by the ascending and descending methods using PS and PNS. Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient revealed a significant positive linear correlation between the PS and PNS results in all measurements. No significant difference was found between the PS and PNS thresholds in all measured items.

CONCLUSIONS

PNS is a useful instrument for performing ECST as a new alternative to PS. ECST using a silver ball electrode is a less invasive and easier test than PST.