Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2023
Cochlear Implantation for Rudimentary Otocysts: Two Case Reports.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Simeng, Wei Xingmei, Kong Ying, Yang Bentao, Dhanasingh Anandhan, Li Yongxin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Rudimentary otocyst (RO) is characterized by an otic capsule without an internal auditory canal, which is considered a contraindication to cochlear implantation (CI). In this study, we were the first to report two patients with ROs who underwent CI.
PATIENT: Two patients (18 months old and 2 years old) presenting with bilateral congenital hearing loss were diagnosed with ROs.
INTERVENTION: CI was performed. The transmastoid slotted labyrinthotomy approach was used with customized MED-EL electrode arrays.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Categorical auditory performance, infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration of sound, the speech intelligibility rating, and meaningful use of speech scale.
RESULTS: Both children could understand common phrases and had intelligible, connected speech 2 years after CI.
CONCLUSION: With proper indication, surgical approach and postoperative training, a child with an RO may benefit from CI.
PATIENT: Two patients (18 months old and 2 years old) presenting with bilateral congenital hearing loss were diagnosed with ROs.
INTERVENTION: CI was performed. The transmastoid slotted labyrinthotomy approach was used with customized MED-EL electrode arrays.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Categorical auditory performance, infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration of sound, the speech intelligibility rating, and meaningful use of speech scale.
RESULTS: Both children could understand common phrases and had intelligible, connected speech 2 years after CI.
CONCLUSION: With proper indication, surgical approach and postoperative training, a child with an RO may benefit from CI.