Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2003
An intraindividual comparative study of psoralen-UVA erythema induced by bath 8-methoxypsoralen and 4, 5', 8-trimethylpsoralen.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Man Irene, McKinlay Jayne, Dawe Robert S, Ferguson James, Ibbotson Sally H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Limited work has been conducted on the characteristics of topical trimethylpsoralen (TMP) psoralen-UVA (PUVA) erythema.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the time-course and dose-response characteristics of erythema induced by topical TMP, and to compare these parameters with those for topical 8-methoxypsoralen (MOP) within patients.
METHODS: After photosensitization of one forearm with topical TMP, test sites were exposed to a UVA dose series. The procedure was repeated on the other forearm using 8-MOP solution. Erythema was assessed visually and with a reflectance instrument every 24 hours for 7 days.
RESULTS: TMP PUVA erythema followed a similar time course to 8-MOP PUVA erythema. The majority of patients were at maximal erythema at or beyond 96 hours. TMP PUVA had a significantly steeper dose-response curve at 48, 72, and 96 hours compared with 8-MOP PUVA.
CONCLUSION: On the basis of these data, the optimal time to read the TMP minimal phototoxic dose is 96 hours. In view of the steeper dose-response curve for TMP PUVA, a lower UVA incremental regimen should be considered compared with that for 8-MOP PUVA.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the time-course and dose-response characteristics of erythema induced by topical TMP, and to compare these parameters with those for topical 8-methoxypsoralen (MOP) within patients.
METHODS: After photosensitization of one forearm with topical TMP, test sites were exposed to a UVA dose series. The procedure was repeated on the other forearm using 8-MOP solution. Erythema was assessed visually and with a reflectance instrument every 24 hours for 7 days.
RESULTS: TMP PUVA erythema followed a similar time course to 8-MOP PUVA erythema. The majority of patients were at maximal erythema at or beyond 96 hours. TMP PUVA had a significantly steeper dose-response curve at 48, 72, and 96 hours compared with 8-MOP PUVA.
CONCLUSION: On the basis of these data, the optimal time to read the TMP minimal phototoxic dose is 96 hours. In view of the steeper dose-response curve for TMP PUVA, a lower UVA incremental regimen should be considered compared with that for 8-MOP PUVA.