MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf01694708

Медицинская библиотека · Intensive care medicine · 1993

Prospective evaluation of self-extubations in a medical intensive care unit.

Vassal T, Anh N G, Gabillet J M, Guidet B, Staikowsky F, Offenstadt G

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence, associated factors and gravity of self-extubations.

DESIGN

Prospective study about all patients intubated over an 8 month period.

SETTING

A medical intensive care unit of a University Hospital.

PATIENTS: Patients were divided into two groups: self-extubated and those that did not. The self-extubations were separated into deliberate acts by the patients and accidental.

RESULTS

24 of the 197 patients included presented a total of 27 extubations (12%). There were 21 deliberate incidents and 6 accidental. The only differences between the cases and the rest of the population were a higher mean age (67 vs 59 years) and a larger proportion of chronic respiratory failure (66% versus 35%). Reintubation was necessary in 20 cases (74%) within 30 min in 16 cases. The main indication for reintubation was acute respiratory distress (90%). Reintubation was associated with one death.

CONCLUSION

Self-extubation is a frequent and serious complication of mechanical ventilation. Deliberate self-extubation, the most frequent type of incident could possibly be reduced by better sedation of agitated patients and accidental self-extubation by better training of the nursing staff.

Для цитирования: Vassal T, Anh N G, Gabillet J M, Guidet B, Staikowsky F, Offenstadt G. Prospective evaluation of self-extubations in a medical intensive care unit.. Intensive care medicine. 1993. DOI: 10.1007/bf01694708.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.