DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112341
Relative monocyte count is associated with metabolic syndrome and other cardiometabolic risk markers in subjects at Secondary Health Care: a cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Relative monocyte count (RMC) is a low-cost widely used biomarker with the potential to predict obesity-related health risks. However, high cardiovascular risk could affect white blood cell dynamics. So, we aimed to investigate the associations between RMC with cardiometabolic risk markers in subjects at secondary prevention.
METHODS
This cross-sectional survey involved 687 subjects at Secondary Health Care. The cardiometabolic risk markers were obesity, metabolic syndrome, high waist circumference, high waist-to-height ratio, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, high glycated hemoglobin, waist-hypertriglyceridemic phenotype 1 and 2, visceral adiposity index, atherogenic index of plasma, lipid accumulation product, and deep-abdominal-adipose-tissue. Pearson's chi-square test, binomial, and multiple Logistic regression were adopted (α = 0.05).
RESULTS
The first tertile of RMC (<5.20 %) was associated with higher odds of metabolic syndrome (OR 1.62; 95 %CI 1.10-2.17 for NCEP-ATPIII criteria and OR 1.48; 95 %CI 1.01-2.33 for IDF), diabetes (OR 1.68; 95 %CI 1.02-2.76), high glycated hemoglobin (OR 2.31; 95 %CI 1.16-4.59), hypertriglyceridemia (OR 1.57; 95 %CI 1.02-2.40), and waist-hypertriglyceridemic phenotype 1 (OR 1.58; 95 %CI 1.04-2.40) and 2 (OR 1.83; 95 %CI 1.17-2.88), compared to the third tertile, regardless of confounders.
CONCLUSION
The lower RMC tertile was associated with higher odds of cardiometabolic disorders in subjects at secondary prevention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.