DOI 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.09.015
Launching minimally invasive stand-alone maze procedure for atrial fibrillation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive Maze procedure via right mini-thoracotomy approach is reportedly a promising option for paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), although it is not widely performed. This study aimed to validate feasibility and safety of minimally invasive stand-alone Maze procedure in an institutional first case series.
METHODS
This study enrolled an institutional consecutive series of 20 cases who underwent minimally invasive Maze procedure between November 2018 and January 2021. Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in five cases who showed moderate tricuspid regurgitation preoperatively.
RESULTS
Minimally invasive Maze procedure using cryo-energy source was successfully accomplished with sinus rhythm being restored at the intensive care unit entry in all cases without conversion to the sternotomy approach. All cases were discharged home, while one case was complicated with stroke postoperatively. Nineteen cases (95%) showed sinus rhythm at the last follow-up, whereas one case, who had large left atrium, showed recurrent persistent AF despite optimum medical therapy. Catheter ablations were performed for residual conductions at box lesions and/or mitral/tricuspid isthmus in three cases, who showed medically refractory atrial tachycardia post-Maze procedure. Consequently, these three cases showed sinus rhythm restoration at the last follow-up
Conclusions
Minimally invasive stand-alone Maze procedure with or without tricuspid annuloplasty was feasible and safe for AF in the institutional first case series. Catheter ablations for recurrent AF post-Maze procedure would be warranted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.