DOI 10.1186/s40001-025-02962-0
Competing risk analysis of dexmedetomidine use and postoperative outcomes in non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Dexmedetomidine is widely used in critically ill patients, but its effects on postoperative outcomes in non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients remain unclear. This study focuses on exploring the impact of dexmedetomidine on postoperative respiratory failure (RF) and in-hospital mortality.
METHODS
The data were downloaded from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database, including 817 non-traumatic SAH patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Multivariable logistic regression, sensitivity, interaction, and subgroup analyses were used to examine the association between dexmedetomidine use and RF or in-hospital mortality. A competing risk model was employed, with RF defined as the event of interest and in-hospital mortality as the competing event, to evaluate the survival probabilities for both outcomes.
RESULTS
Dexmedetomidine use was a risk factor for RF but a protective factor for in-hospital mortality both pre-/post-PSM (p < 0.05). The protective effect of dexmedetomidine on mortality was more pronounced in younger patients (≤ 62 years) and those without cerebrovascular disease. Competing risk analysis showed that even after adjusting for confounders, dexmedetomidine remained a significant protective factor for in-hospital mortality, but did not affect the incidence of RF.
CONCLUSIONS
Dexmedetomidine use in non-traumatic SAH patients significantly reduces in-hospital mortality but does not affect the incidence of postoperative RF. These findings highlight the importance of considering competing risks when evaluating the effects of dexmedetomidine on postoperative outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.