MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery · 2006

[Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: case report].

Ohyama Shigeru, Oki Shuichi, Sumida Masayuki, Isobe Naoyuki, Kureshima Makoto, Kurokawa Yasuharu

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We report the case of a glossopharyngeal neuralgia that was successfully treated using microvascular decompression (MVD). A 61-year-old female reported intermittent piercing pain from tongue to pinna on the left side. Although she had been prescribed carbamazepine and has undergone attempted nerve block on several occasions, no pain relief has been achieved. MVD was thus attempted using a lateral suboccipital approach. The offending vessel, which was PICA, had adhered to the glossopharyngeal nerve and was repositioned laterally away from the nerve by interposition of a felt cushion. Pain disappeared immediately after surgery and has not recurred. In the literature, MVD for glossopharyngeal neuralgia has been performed using a transcondylar approach to achieve minimally invasive surgery. However, the sensory distributions for the floor of the oral cavity and tongue involve 4 overlapping nerves: the trigeminal nerve, sensory components of the facial and vagal nerves, and the glossopharyngeal nerve. In typical cases, it seems that the transcondylar fossa approach is appropriate for glossopharyngeal neuralgia. If the pain occurs in the place involving an overlapping nerve, the lateral suboccipital approach might be necessary.

Для цитирования: Ohyama Shigeru, Oki Shuichi, Sumida Masayuki, Isobe Naoyuki, Kureshima Makoto, Kurokawa Yasuharu. [Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: case report].. No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.