Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
Semi-automatic segmentation from intrinsically-registered 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for treatment response assessment in a breast cancer cohort: comparison to manual DCE-MRI.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Andreassen Maren Marie Sjaastad, Goa Pål Erik, Sjøbakk Torill Eidhammer, Hedayati Roja, Eikesdal Hans Petter, Deng Callie, Østlie Agnes, Lundgren Steinar, Bathen Tone Frost, Jerome Neil Peter
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability of simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI)-derived biomarkers using semi-automated Gaussian mixture model (GMM) segmentation on PET images, against conventional manual tumor segmentation on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four breast cancer patients underwent PET/MRI (following 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) injection) at baseline and during neoadjuvant treatment, yielding 53 data sets (24 untreated, 29 treated). Two-dimensional tumor segmentation was performed manually on DCE-MRI images (manual DCE) and using GMM with corresponding PET images (GMM-PET). Tumor area and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from both segmentation methods were compared, and spatial overlap between the segmentations was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient and center-of-gravity displacement.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between mean ADC and tumor area derived from manual DCE segmentation and GMM-PET. There were strong positive correlations for tumor area and ADC derived from manual DCE and GMM-PET for untreated and treated lesions. The mean Dice score for GMM-PET was 0.770 and 0.649 for untreated and treated lesions, respectively.
DISCUSSION: Using PET/MRI, tumor area and mean ADC value estimated with a GMM-PET can replicate manual DCE tumor definition from MRI for monitoring neoadjuvant treatment response in breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four breast cancer patients underwent PET/MRI (following 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) injection) at baseline and during neoadjuvant treatment, yielding 53 data sets (24 untreated, 29 treated). Two-dimensional tumor segmentation was performed manually on DCE-MRI images (manual DCE) and using GMM with corresponding PET images (GMM-PET). Tumor area and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from both segmentation methods were compared, and spatial overlap between the segmentations was assessed with Dice similarity coefficient and center-of-gravity displacement.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between mean ADC and tumor area derived from manual DCE segmentation and GMM-PET. There were strong positive correlations for tumor area and ADC derived from manual DCE and GMM-PET for untreated and treated lesions. The mean Dice score for GMM-PET was 0.770 and 0.649 for untreated and treated lesions, respectively.
DISCUSSION: Using PET/MRI, tumor area and mean ADC value estimated with a GMM-PET can replicate manual DCE tumor definition from MRI for monitoring neoadjuvant treatment response in breast cancer.