MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bjo.79.11.993

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of ophthalmology · 1995

Corneal sensitivity in patients with leprosy and in controls.

Hieselaar L C, Hogeweg M, de Vries C L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: In a quantitative prospective study the corneal sensation in patients with leprosy was compared with age matched controls.

METHODS

The patients with leprosy were classified as paucibacillary and multibacillary and were divided in three groups: (1) patients without clinically detectable eye pathology; (2) patients with lagophthalmos, (3) patients with signs of iridocyclitis. The corneal sensitivity was assessed with the Cochet and Bonnet aesthesiometer.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in corneal sensitivity in multibacillary patients without clinically detectable eye pathology and in patients with lagophthalmos or iritis when compared with controls. A significant correlation between the loss of power of the orbicularis oculi muscle and the degree of corneal sensation loss could not be established. No significant decrease in corneal sensitivity was found in paucibacillary patients without eye pathology compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that loss of corneal sensation can occur while there is no clinically detectable eye pathology, at least in multibacillary patients. Regular checkups of the corneal sensation should, therefore, be part of the routine control of leprosy patients. Health education on eye care and early warning signs should be encouraged.

Для цитирования: Hieselaar L C, Hogeweg M, de Vries C L. Corneal sensitivity in patients with leprosy and in controls.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1995. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.79.11.993.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.