MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0127_cothho_2.3.co_2

Медицинская библиотека · The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 1996

Comparison of the hearing histories of children with and without cleft palate.

Broen P A, Moller K T, Carlstrom J, Doyle S S, Devers M, Keenan K M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Aggressive otologic management has been recommended for children with cleft palate because of the almost universal occurrence of otitis media with effusion (OME) in these children and the association of OME with hearing loss and possible language, cognitive, and academic delays. In this study, 28 children with cleft palate and 29 noncleft children were seen at 3-month intervals from 9 to 30 months to compare otologic treatment and management. Hearing and middle ear function were tested at each session; information on ventilation tube placement was obtained from medical records. Ventilation tubes were placed earlier and more often in children with cleft palate, but children with cleft palates failed the hearing screening more often. The correlation between age at first tube placement and frequency of hearing screening failures was significant for the children with cleft palate, indicating that the later tubes were first placed, the poorer the child's hearing.

Для цитирования: Broen P A, Moller K T, Carlstrom J, Doyle S S, Devers M, Keenan K M. Comparison of the hearing histories of children with and without cleft palate.. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 1996. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0127_cothho_2.3.co_2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.