The superiority of manual over automated methods in identifying bronchial trees on identical CT images.

The purpose of this study was to compare a manual bronchoscopic navigation technique, the direct oblique method (DOM), with conventional virtual bronchoscopic navigation software in terms of bronchial identification ability involving reconstruction of a whole bronchial tree from identical CT images. A whole bronchial tree was drawn using manual bronchial recognition with the DOM. The tree was compared with that reconstructed by SYNAPSE VINCENT bronchoscopic navigation-dedicated software. The number of bronchial generations at each terminal tip was then compared between the two approaches. Physicians spent 20 h tracing all bronchi on CT scan images and obtained a bronchial tree. The hand-made bronchial tree had five times the number of tips as that reconstructed by automatic bronchial recognition (1482 vs. 279 tips, respectively). The number of bronchial generations prior to each terminal tip was larger with the DOM than with VINCENT (median, 10; interquartile range (IQR), 9-11 vs. median, 5; IQR, 5-7, respectively; p-value < 0.001). Using the CT image data in this case, manual bronchial recognition with the DOM identified more bronchi than automatic bronchial recognition. This result implies that manual bronchial recognition is a valid basis for detailed bronchoscopic navigation analysis.